Senin, 27 Mei 2013

This is a re-publication Notice: Union states Calls


Sunday, May 26, 2013

This is a 3d publication Notice: Union states Calls

Notice: New url is http://www.unionstates.org
Please contact us at info@unionstates.org
Message Line: 206-350-3797
This is a re-publication Notice: Union states Calls

(Before It's News)
beforeitsnews.com/international/2013/05/union-states-calls-2457342.html


Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:52 AM
Gene L info@unionstates.orgMessage Line: 206-350-3797


Be warned!



Some people are trying their best to hijack the union states project. These are the same people who have been holding this movement back for several months by various tactics. The latest tactics were to hijack the phone numbers and websites that were set up and dedicated to the union states project. They are associating union states with activities that could easily harm the union states movement, and could even place unwary participants (you) into harm's way.

This rogue group has tried to prevent the success of the union states project for several months now by continually creating repetitive and redundant arguments during the calls, displaying unacceptable behavior, driving good people away, and refusing to accept the fact that certain standards must be met in order to join the union states movement. Historically, it has always been necessary for a state to meet certain criteria in order to join the union. That only makes common sense.

Union states is built on a process started by the Pennsylvania group in 2011. That process was improved and strengthened to assure the success of our efforts. The steps are not difficult, but they are necessary. We determined those steps after experiencing the failure of other movements for the lack of these steps. Any states not willing to complete the steps have freedom of choice to find another movement that suits them better. They do not, however have freedom to fraudulently lead people to believe they were attending a legitimate union states call after the control of the usual phone number were hijacked and fraudulent notices were sent stating that they were conducting a union states call. Of course, this call was done while the real union states call was being conducted on another number. We were locked out of using our usual number, and had to procure another number at the last minute. People who got onto that bogus call were lied to, and made to believe that they were on a union states call. They were led to believe that we abandoned them - another lie. We, the union states folks who started this movement, and have nurtured it along for nearly a year have not altered our course. That is apparently what infuriates the opposition - they cannot deter us. They were temporarily successful in slowing us down, but they cannot stop us. We only hope you can see through the deception. We have nearly reached our first mission of restoring the original thirteen states. Soon after that, the rest of the states will join the union.

This attempted takeover is being spearheaded by Stephen Hance, who has been disruptive, belligerent, combative, condescending, trying to infuse confusion and chaos to derail our movement. If you have been on any of the calls the past few months, you have heard his rants. I suggest you check his record as a troublemaker in any group he has joined, including the Montana Freemen. Make up your own mind if you want to hitch up with this man, but be very careful where he leads you. He is also a documented liar. When he pulled out of the union states, he stated clearly that it was with the advice and consent of the other folks in North Carolina - not true. We have testimony from folks in that group who knew nothing of Stephens actions - they were not consulted or informed at all - a true mark of an underhanded maneuver to deceive. If you follow him, watch your back, and God help you if you dare disagree with any of his pontifications. You will be made to look like the stupidest imbecile on earth in front of all others (who will remain silent because they don't want to face Stephen's irrational wrath).

Gus remains in control of the skype room we dubbed "union states planning group" and "union states Friday. .". Never mind that he said from the beginning that the room belonged to union states. He merely has to prevent people who know the truth of the matter from entering the room and others will not be the wiser. Same thing with the websites and the phone numbers, which are in his name, but which he pledged to the use of the union states. You should visit both of the websites, unionstatesproject.infoand unionstatesproject.org, then ask yourself if you want to personally be associated with, and possibly be held responsible for the action Gus is attempting on the de facto corporation - a place where we have no business or authority to meddle. Also ask if it is wise to have union states appear to endorse such actions, and the actions that are being purposed by others in this splinter group. Also ask yourself if you want to associate with someone who breached his word, his trust, and his fiduciary duty by exerting unauthorized control over something that belonged to all of us.



Regarding our Skype rooms: When it became apparent that someone was trying to pull a coup, and because many things were being discussed in those skype rooms that could, by association, expose the participants to serious consequences, and to protect union states and all participants, those Skype rooms that were controlled by union states folks were shut down. If you were in those rooms, you would have received a notice that you "have been removed" - that is because the room was shut down - you were not singled out. A new skype room has been set up for our purposes. You will be given instructions for joining that new room on the next call. Our new website will also be announced on our next call.

We will complete this project as planned in spite of the opposition. While some have been obstructing our progress, others have been quietly working with the remaining states to achieve our goal. We will soon have the requisite number of states to affect the rebirth of "The United States of America". Soon after that, we will see the fruits of our labor.

As announced, it is time for all the completed original 13 states to mail two certified copies of their Notice package to Dean in Virginia. This must be done in order to assemble the package that will be taken to the Pentagon and sent to The Hague. This needs to be done by Friday, May 17, 2013. Any state failing to meet that deadline will, by necessity, be eliminated from the union states movement and replaced by folks who will cooperate to get the job done.

Something as monumental as this movement will naturally be a target of those who don't want us to succeed. It happened to our forefathers, it happened to many of us in the past, and it is being attempted again. Truth will triumph and we will ultimately be able to pass a new nation to our posterity in spite of all opposition.

We will be addressing the original 13 union states each Friday at 9:00 pm eastern. The phone number is ( EDITED TBA). On Wednesdays at 9:00 pm eastern, we will be talking to the remaining states, helping to get their paperwork ready in order to join the union. The Wednesday number is( EDITED TBA).

Please make a special effort to join the calls with the rest of us both nights and help support this labor of love. God Bless

Respectfully,

Gene
                                                                                         http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/05/union-states-warning-2639982.htmlhttp://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-99043/TS-746298.mp3
Gene speaks on union states at 16 minutes
Please Post this repy after the dajavu comment


Yes,  I give you a Republic, if you can keep it! Ah but merely smoke and mirrors  as few did not know of the Jesuit connection, nor the " corporate connection" or the “ city of London connection”   The Republic was never properly established and does not exist except in your own mind.
 1787  is the date to look  in  us history when all of the people were fooled, just as you are fooled today. 
                                                                                                                                                                                           "Antifederalists were found at their boarding house and then dragged through the streets of Philadelphia and deposited in the Pennsylvania State House with the doors locked behind them. The presence of these Antifederalists against their will, created the required number of members to allow a special convention to be called in the state, which eventually voted 46 to 23 to accept the Constitution."                                                                          
The Ratification Process: State by State
The ratification process started when the Congress turned the Constitution over to the state legislatures for consideration through specially elected state conventions of the people. Five state conventions voted to approve the Constitution almost immediately (December 1787 to January 1788) and in all of them the vote was unanimous (Delaware, New Jersey, Georgia) or lopsided (Pennsylvania, Connecticut). Clearly, the well-organized Federalists began the contest in strong shape as they rapidly secured five of the nine states needed to make the Constitution law. The Constitution seemed to have easy, broad, and popular support.

However, a closer look at who ratified the Constitution in these early states and how it was done indicates that the contest was much closer than might appear at first glance. Four of the five states to first ratify were small states that stood to benefit from a strong national government that could restrain abuses by their larger neighbors.

The process in Pennsylvania, the one large early ratifier, was nothing less than corrupt. The PENNSYLVANIA STATE ASSEMBLY was about to have its term come to an end, and had begun to consider calling a special convention on the Constitution, even before Congress had forwarded it to the states. Antifederalists in the state assembly tried to block this move by refusing to attend the last two days of the session, since without them there would not be enough members present for the state legislature to make a binding legal decision. As a result extraordinarily coercive measures were taken to force Antifederalists to attend. Antifederalists were found at their boarding house and then dragged through the streets of Philadelphia and deposited in the Pennsylvania State House with the doors locked behind them. The presence of these Antifederalists against their will, created the required number of members to allow a special convention to be called in the state, which eventually voted 46 to 23 to accept the Constitution.

The first real test of the Constitution in an influential state with both sides prepared for the contest came in Massachusetts in January 1788. Here influential older Patriots like GOVERNOR JOHN HANCOCK and Sam Adams led the Antifederalists. Further, the rural western part of the state, where Shays' Rebellion had occurred the previous year, was an Antifederalist stronghold. A bitterly divided month-long debate ensued that ended with a close vote (187-168) in favor of the Constitution.                                                                                 Crucial to this narrow victory was the strong support of artisans who favored the new commercial powers of the proposed central government that might raise tariffs (taxes) on cheap British imports that threatened their livelihood. The Federalists' narrow victory in Massachusetts rested on a cross-class alliance between elite nationalists and urban workingmen.
The Massachusetts vote also included an innovation with broad significance. John Hancock who shifted his initial opposition to the Constitution led the move toward ratification. Satisfied that certain amendments protecting individual rights were going to be considered by the first new Congress that would meet should the Constitution become law. This compromise helped carry the narrow victory in Massachusetts and was adopted by every subsequent state convention to ratify (except Maryland).

By the spring conventions in the required nine states had ratified, and the Constitution could become law. But with powerful, populous, and highly divided Virginia and New York yet to vote, the legitimacy of the new national system had not yet been fully resolved.             

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar